2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, both 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom and 2013 Smart Fortwo were released in the same year (2013). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1809 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 628 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Smart |
Model | Phantom | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2013 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 5350 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 720 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 81 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | 8-speed automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2649 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5842 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1638 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3570 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.3 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 33 L |