1941 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2008 Ford Mustang is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 62. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1072 kg more than 1941 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1941 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 4606 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 2862 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2730 mm |
