1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1962 Volvo 120
To start off, 1962 Volvo 120 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 810 kg more than 1962 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 1962 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | 60 | 120 |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2610 mm |
