1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 1983 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1983 Ford Tempo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 710 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 1983 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 60 | Tempo |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2540 mm |
