1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2003 Mazda 2
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 2. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 740 kg more than 2003 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Cadillac 60 | 2003 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 60 | 2 |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5671 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 81 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2500 mm |
