1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2008 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 66 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu (170 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1942 Cadillac 60 has manual transmission. 1942 Cadillac 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Cadillac 60 | 2008 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 60 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1942 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5671 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2860 mm |