1942 Cadillac 60 vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 69 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1942 Cadillac 60 has manual transmission. 1942 Cadillac 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Cadillac 60 | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | 60 | Epica |
Year Released | 1942 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5671 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2700 mm |