1944 Ford Taunus vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1944 Ford Taunus. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1944 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1944 Ford Taunus weights approximately 155 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1944 Ford Taunus | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Taunus | M250 |
| Year Released | 1944 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 176 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2520 mm |
