1946 Austin 16 vs. 1984 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 1984 Plymouth Reliant is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Austin 16 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1984 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 1946 Austin 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Austin 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Austin 16 | 1984 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Austin | Plymouth |
Model | 16 | Reliant |
Year Released | 1946 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2260 mm |