1946 Buick 40 vs. 2005 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1946 Buick 40. (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1946 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 264 kg more than 2005 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Buick 40 | 2005 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | 40 | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5249 cc | 3984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 92.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 109.5 mm | 99.3 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1581 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2930 mm |
