1946 Lancia Ardea 3 vs. 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 866 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Lancia | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ardea 3 | Outlander |
Year Released | 1946 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 903 cc | 2360 cc |
Horse Power | 28 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 674 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 63 L |