1947 Austin 16 vs. 1990 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1947 Austin 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Austin 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin 16 | 1990 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | 16 | Le Baron |
Year Released | 1947 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 100 L |