1948 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1997 Suzuki C2
To start off, 1997 Suzuki C2 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 652 kg more than 1997 Suzuki C2.
Because 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1997 Suzuki C2 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Suzuki |
Model | 6C | C2 |
Year Released | 1948 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 848 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2240 mm |