1948 Riley RM A vs. 2010 Renault Grand Scenic
To start off, 2010 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Grand Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Grand Scenic weights approximately 277 kg more than 1948 Riley RM A.
Because 1948 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Grand Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Riley RM A | 2010 Renault Grand Scenic | |
| Make | Riley | Renault |
| Model | RM A | Grand Scenic |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1494 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 133 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1512 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2740 mm |
