1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1975 Chrysler Charger
To start off, 1975 Chrysler Charger is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,521 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Chrysler Charger (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 220 kg more than 1975 Chrysler Charger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1975 Chrysler Charger | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
Model | 6C | Charger |
Year Released | 1949 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2680 mm |