1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2004 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2004 Fiat Panda is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C (94 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Panda. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 274 kg more than 2004 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2004 Fiat Panda | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Fiat |
Model | 6C | Panda |
Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2230 mm |