1949 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 150 kg more than 2012 Chevrolet Orlando.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Chevrolet Orlando | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | 62 | Orlando |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5425 cc | 2384 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 174 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1836 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2760 mm |
