1949 Jeep CJ3A vs. 1966 Saab 96
To start off, 1966 Saab 96 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Saab 96 (64 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Saab 96 should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 237 kg more than 1966 Saab 96.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Saab 96. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1949 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Saab 96. (116 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1949 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Saab 96.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Jeep CJ3A | 1966 Saab 96 | |
Make | Jeep | Saab |
Model | CJ3A | 96 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1966 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 873 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2500 mm |