1949 Renault Juva vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Renault Juva would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC90 (200 HP) has 176 more horse power than 1949 Renault Juva. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1949 Renault Juva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1345 kg more than 1949 Renault Juva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Renault Juva. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Renault Juva | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | Juva | XC90 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Size | 1003 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1897 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2860 mm |