1949 Riley RM A vs. 2004 Spyker C8
To start off, 2004 Spyker C8 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,999 cc, 2004 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Spyker C8 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1949 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Riley RM A | 2004 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Riley | Spyker |
| Model | RM A | C8 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3999 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2680 mm |
