1950 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1982 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | 6C | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 4995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 94.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 88.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 76 L |
