1950 Allard K2 vs. 1973 NSU Ro 80

To start off, 1973 NSU Ro 80 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1973 NSU Ro 80 has automatic transmission and 1950 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1950 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1973 NSU Ro 80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: