1950 Allard K2 vs. 1993 Ford Mondeo
To start off, 1993 Ford Mondeo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Ford Mondeo (90 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Allard K2 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1993 Ford Mondeo.
Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 1993 Ford Mondeo | |
Make | Allard | Ford |
Model | K2 | Mondeo |
Year Released | 1950 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |