1950 Allard K2 vs. 1994 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 1994 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi Magna (161 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mitsubishi Magna weights approximately 185 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 1994 Mitsubishi Magna | |
| Make | Allard | Mitsubishi |
| Model | K2 | Magna |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2730 mm |
