1950 Allard K2 vs. 1999 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1999 Ford Falcon is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Falcon weights approximately 335 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 1999 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Allard | Ford |
| Model | K2 | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2880 mm |
