1950 Allard K2 vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 565 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Allard K2 | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Allard | Ford |
| Model | K2 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3010 mm |
