1950 Allard K2 vs. 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser
To start off, 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser (180 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser weights approximately 212 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Allard K2 | 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser | |
Make | Allard | Chrysler |
Model | K2 | PT Cruiser |
Year Released | 1950 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2424 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1407 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2620 mm |