1950 Allard K2 vs. 2006 Mazda 6

To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 6 weights approximately 155 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1950 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1950 Allard K2 2006 Mazda 6
Make Allard Mazda
Model K2 6
Year Released 1950 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3622 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 85 HP 139 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 6000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1195 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Length 4270 mm 4690 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2680 mm