1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2002 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 935 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Bristol 450 | 2002 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Bristol | Jaguar |
| Model | 450 | XJR |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 86.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 90.3 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2910 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 85 L |
