1950 Holden FX vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace
To start off, 1950 Holden FX is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace (72 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 550 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | |
| Make | Holden | Simca |
| Model | FX | Type 11 Monoplace |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1220 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 72 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2250 mm |
