1950 Holden FX vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 1965 Seat 600 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 395 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1950 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Holden | Seat |
| Model | FX | 600 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 767 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2010 mm |
