1950 Holden FX vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 1982 Renault 9 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Renault 9 (59 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Renault 9 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 120 kg more than 1982 Renault 9.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 9. (100 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1950 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 9.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | FX | 9 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2490 mm |