1950 Holden FX vs. 1989 Mazda 626

To start off, 1989 Mazda 626 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Mazda 626 (89 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Mazda 626 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 626. (134 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1950 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 626.

Compare all specifications: