1950 Holden FX vs. 1997 Ford Mustang

To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Mustang (212 HP) has 161 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Mustang weights approximately 506 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Ford Mustang has automatic transmission and 1950 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1950 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Ford Mustang will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1950 Holden FX 1997 Ford Mustang
Make Holden Ford
Model FX Mustang
Year Released 1950 1997
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2165 cc 4942 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 51 HP 212 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Vehicle Weight 970 kg 1476 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 4660 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2580 mm