1950 Holden FX vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (138 HP) has 87 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 520 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications:

1950 Holden FX 2004 Nissan X-Trail
Make Holden Nissan
Model FX X-Trail
Year Released 1950 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2165 cc 1996 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 51 HP 138 HP
Torque 136 Nm 192 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Vehicle Weight 970 kg 1490 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 4660 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1680 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2630 mm