1950 Holden FX vs. 2006 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2006 Peugeot 207 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Peugeot 207 (88 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 207 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Peugeot 207. (133 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1950 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Peugeot 207.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2006 Peugeot 207 | |
Make | Holden | Peugeot |
Model | FX | 207 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 88 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2610 mm |