1950 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2001 Suzuki Lapin
To start off, 2001 Suzuki Lapin is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Suzuki Lapin (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki Lapin should accelerate faster than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 230 kg more than 2001 Suzuki Lapin.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Suzuki Lapin. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki Lapin. (108 Nm). This means 1950 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki Lapin.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Jeep CJ3A | 2001 Suzuki Lapin | |
| Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
| Model | CJ3A | Lapin |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2370 mm |
