1951 Allard K2 vs. 1949 Bristol 400
To start off, 1951 Allard K2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 400 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1949 Bristol 400. (79 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1949 Bristol 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K2 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1949 Bristol 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Allard K2 | 1949 Bristol 400 | |
| Make | Allard | Bristol |
| Model | K2 | 400 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1971 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2900 mm |
