1951 Humber Pullman vs. 1963 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 1963 Plymouth Valiant is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 100 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Humber Pullman | 1963 Plymouth Valiant | |
| Make | Humber | Plymouth |
| Model | Pullman | Valiant |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4085 cc | 2789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2700 mm |
