1951 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2011 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2011 Subaru Outback is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Subaru Outback (170 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Subaru Outback weights approximately 445 kg more than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Subaru Outback (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2011 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Jeep CJ3A | 2011 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Jeep | Subaru |
Model | CJ3A | Outback |
Year Released | 1951 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2741 mm |