1951 Riley RM A vs. 1956 Riley RM A
To start off, 1956 Riley RM A is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. Both 1951 Riley RM A and 1956 Riley RM A are equipped with a 1,495 cc engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Riley RM A | 1956 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Riley | Riley |
| Model | RM A | RM A |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2870 mm |
