1951 Riley RM A vs. 2005 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2005 Toyota Camry is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Camry weights approximately 375 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Because 1951 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Riley RM A | 2005 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Riley | Toyota |
| Model | RM A | Camry |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 3310 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2610 mm |
