1951 Talbot Baby vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 3,375 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (183 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1951 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1951 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 237 kg more than 1951 Talbot Baby. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Talbot Baby | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Talbot | Toyota |
Model | Baby | Tundra |
Year Released | 1951 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 2690 cc | 3375 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1887 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 3270 mm |