1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1970 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 1970 Datsun 240Z is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Datsun 240Z (151 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Datsun 240Z should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 332 kg more than 1970 Datsun 240Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1970 Datsun 240Z | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Datsun |
| Model | 6C | 240Z |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 151 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 73.7 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 201 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1068 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2300 mm |
