1952 Allard K2 vs. 1974 Chrysler 160
To start off, 1974 Chrysler 160 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1974 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1974 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 135 kg more than 1974 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1974 Chrysler 160 | |
| Make | Allard | Chrysler |
| Model | K2 | 160 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1639 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1065 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2680 mm |
