1952 Allard K2 vs. 1991 Citroen C
To start off, 1991 Citroen C is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1991 Citroen C. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1991 Citroen C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 355 kg more than 1991 Citroen C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Citroen C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1991 Citroen C | |
| Make | Allard | Citroen |
| Model | K2 | C |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 954 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 845 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2760 mm |
