1952 Allard K2 vs. 1995 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 1995 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Jeep Cherokee (181 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 360 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 1995 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Allard | Jeep |
| Model | K2 | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 181 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2580 mm |
