1952 Allard K2 vs. 1996 Volkswagen Cabriolet
To start off, 1996 Volkswagen Cabriolet is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volkswagen Cabriolet (115 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Cabriolet should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Cabriolet, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1996 Volkswagen Cabriolet | |
Make | Allard | Volkswagen |
Model | K2 | Cabriolet |
Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2480 mm |