1952 Allard K2 vs. 2001 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2001 Toyota RunX is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota RunX (103 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RunX should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 20 kg more than 2001 Toyota RunX.
Because 2001 Toyota RunX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RunX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Toyota RunX has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Toyota RunX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 2001 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Allard | Toyota |
Model | K2 | RunX |
Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |