1952 Allard K2 vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 71 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | K2 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2966 cc |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1129 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2680 mm |
